<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Canada need a federal child care program?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thier.ca/cbc/?feed=rss2&#038;p=738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thier.ca/cbc/?p=738</link>
	<description>Society, Politics, Religion, the Stock Market, and Software Development.  Anything we feel like, really.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 13:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.thier.ca/cbc/?p=738&#038;cpage=1#comment-68583</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Lynch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thier.ca/cbc/?p=738#comment-68583</guid>
		<description>You state that heath care is important enough to need federal, but is our children any less important?  

Don&#039;t get me wrong, but I do agree, these issues should not be the responsibility of the federal government.  Who knows better what services and products are need, than the area that the services and products are for?  As you stated, rural communities have different needs than largely populated areas.

I feel thar you can&#039;t keep one program federal, and not another.  All social programs or none.  

Tracy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You state that heath care is important enough to need federal, but is our children any less important?  </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, but I do agree, these issues should not be the responsibility of the federal government.  Who knows better what services and products are need, than the area that the services and products are for?  As you stated, rural communities have different needs than largely populated areas.</p>
<p>I feel thar you can&#8217;t keep one program federal, and not another.  All social programs or none.  </p>
<p>Tracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman at Mile 0</title>
		<link>http://www.thier.ca/cbc/?p=738&#038;cpage=1#comment-68513</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman at Mile 0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thier.ca/cbc/?p=738#comment-68513</guid>
		<description>Good grief. It was provincial.  The Fed Liberals provided consultation and developed a ELCC framework agreement on some key principals and rolled funding to the provinces, who expanded and rolled out their own programs. Some provinces focused on child care with others focusing on early learning through current education models (e.g Ontario, BC), etc.  It was all individual anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief. It was provincial.  The Fed Liberals provided consultation and developed a ELCC framework agreement on some key principals and rolled funding to the provinces, who expanded and rolled out their own programs. Some provinces focused on child care with others focusing on early learning through current education models (e.g Ontario, BC), etc.  It was all individual anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
