Everything you ever wanted to know about the situation in Iraq

Comments Off

Found this really interesting site called Iraq Index. Has all kinds of data including military levels, casualties, etc. But most interesting is the data on things like electricity levels, unemployment rates, polls of the population, etc. Basically lots of things I’ve wondered about for a while and it’s nice to see it all in one place.

It’s encouraging to see some of the answers to the opinion polls, but also a little discouraging to see the rate of infrastructure improvement and unemployment. One of the best ways to slow the insurgency would be to have everyone working. Unemployed and disillusioned youth are probably the most susceptable to extremism. But, employing everyone is obviously not an easy task. I wonder how many foreign contractors are in the country and how many could have been Iraqis? I have no idea of the magnitude. As I saw in India, we take it for granted that things like construction projects can also be solved by throwing large numbers of people at it for manual labour. Maybe they are doing this, but who knows – some people would say the US was running back-breaking labour camps…

Major news media actually gets Isreali terrorist attack correct

Comments Off

Wow. I’m stunned. As jaded as I am about the news media, I saw a story on the Israeli attacker and immediately thought they’d somehow spin it as an “attack” or something else non-terrorism related.

Guess what I saw? CNN has in the headline that Sharon called the attacker a Jewish Terrorist.

Even FOX gets some kudos for the headline Israeli Extremist Kills Three on Bus.

For so long the media has spun all acts done by Arabs as terrorism and not anything done by Israelis or westerners. Now, the next step is to properly name it when Israel sends its attack helicopters in to attack. What’s the difference? Both cases are for retaliation. The only difference is that one decision was made by a guy in a suit and not the other. Oh, and plus all the money floating around in lobby groups.

Is Intelligent Design a theory?

1 Comment

I saw a report on one of the network news shows last night talking about Intelligent Design vs. Evolution in schools. They took a poll and the question was worded something like “Would you be mad if Evolution was taught to your children in school?” and similarly for ID. The results were interesting from 2 perspectives.

Something like 64% said they were fine with Evolution being taught and 74% were OK with ID. At first this suprised me (well, not suprised since this isn’t news … more frustration) but there’s another possible explanation than the obvious. I think people who believe in Evolution are also more likely to be open to other ideas. Most people understand that evolution is a theory, therefore not a proven fact. However, from the interactions I’ve seen the hard-core Creationists are very exclusive of other ideas. They’re sensitive enough about the scientific grounds for their ideas that they want to make sure everyone else knows all other ideas are “just theories” as well. It’s kind of like an inferiority complex. These are the same people so well-tuned to reality they’re claiming the existence of a “war against Christianity” in the US.

The next part is the obvious frustration that about 35% of people would be upset at Evolution being taught. Ok, I can totally buy the “it’s not a proven fact – make that clear” argument. But, being that it is considered the best theory we have on the subject by the overwhelming majority of scientists, I’d say it at least warrants mentioning. Kids of these parents are going to grow up intellectually stunted. Whole generations of Americans could lose an entire 35% of it’s population being eligible for the fields of geology, biology, etc, etc.

Maybe next kids will be taught that babies are delivered by storks and to “just ignore those feelings you get in your pants.” Teen pregnancy would soar to all-new highs. Oh, wait… that’s already happened…

Lastly, I know I said there were only 2 parts, but this just keeps popping up into my head. Evidence is pretty clear on the issue that the more industrialized (ie: modern) a society becomes the less influence religion holds. This is true pretty much everywhere but the US. I’m desperately craving theories about why this is. Is it at least partially due to religion being such big business here? Throughout the ages many religions have been guilty of making lots of money, but has modern capitalism turned religion into even more of a business venture? Therefore lots of effort is spent keeping people on board? I don’t know… but remember kids: “it’s just a theory.”

Newer Entries