Red, Orange or Green
Apr 26
It’s tough deciding where to put my vote on the “left” and it’s not getting any easier this election.
Let’s take a look at my choices:
Liberals
The traditional “safe” left-leaning vote, although there’s been a lot of talk recently about them having moved too far to the right. Their platform doesn’t have a lot of pizazz, at least on the surface, but that’s also not necessarily a bad thing. Given their past track record, I think they would make incremental improvements on some issues I care about, like environment/climate change, health care, education, etc, but it won’t be a whole lot. Importantly, I do believe they’d be good for the budget and economy, and wouldn’t over-spend.
NDP
I’ll admit I’ve always had a somewhat negative opinion of the NDP. I’d classify myself as “liberal” (left-leaning) on most matters, but at least economically I’m much more of a pragmatist. The NDP has always had the reputation of the irresponsible spenders on big social programs, and honestly, after taking a look at their current platform, I’d have to say that’s not too far off the mark. Here are the items in their platform that I can eyeball and classify as likely “new big ticket items” for the government:
- Doubling pension benefits
- Increase in the Guaranteed Income Supplement
- National child care program
- Post-secondary education transfers and benefits
- Home heating tax rebates and energy retrofit rebates
- Increase in child tax benefit
- Extending employment insurance
- Reducing small business taxes
- New business tax credits
- Lots of new “infrastructure” projects
- Improvements to the health care system, such as training more doctors and nurses
- Expanding public transit
- Hiring more police and other new community safety investments
Here are a few items I can think of that will have a questionable effect on the economy, so it’s yet unknown whether it would increase or decrease government revenues:
- A national minimum wage
- Carbon cap-and-trade system
Looking at those lists, there are items for everyone to love. There isn’t really anything I personally wouldn’t like. My next thought is “holy crap, how are you going to pay for all of that?” Of the 15 items above, if you took just 2 or 3 of them you could build a compelling platform, so why push a platform that obviously (to me) can’t be achieved? I know they don’t figure on becoming the government, so maybe they just listed everything they like, but if so that’s very disingenuous. Let’s compare their platform with the Greens.
Green
At least on national polls, it looks like Green support is down to about 5 or 6% from about the 10% they got in the last election. I read their platform last election and I was surprised at how reasonable it was. Their economic models and assumptions don’t seem overly optimistic, at least on the surface, and they cost everything out. Here’s the Green 2011 platform budget. I won’t list out the new expenditures here, like I did for the NDP, because the Green budget conveniently lists them all, plus all budget reductions from elsewhere, and all itemized over the next 3 years too.
Summary
As many Canadians are, I’m torn between voting for who I really want to win versus who I think can win and achieve at least some of my interests. Since a Conservative won my riding by only 17 votes in the last election, strategic voting is more on my mind than it’s ever been before. But, honestly, I would feel kind of guilty voting purely strategically. I don’t think it’s wrong at all, but I guess I’m in more of a politically idealist mood lately. Since in Canada we have a unified conservative party but a fractured liberal side, I think the liberal parties need to cooperate and not be scared of the word “coalition”. I don’t see anything wrong with a coalition, but if the parties are afraid of it then they should know they’ll have to merge.
RSS
Apr 26, 2011 @ 07:20:18
Thank you for actually reading our plan and budget. If the average voter would take the effort to do the same or the media would actually do its job people would understand we are not loonies, one issue or without a solid plan.
good luck making your choice.
Apr 26, 2011 @ 07:29:13
the liberals support war and occupation abroad. they support asbestos exports. they savagely gutted social programs in the 1990s. they ruthlessly supported the entire free trade agenda across the 90s. the growing polarization of wealth and income is a legacy of their governments.
the greens are a completely wasted vote in this election. you might as well hand power to the Cons.
if you want to stop a harper majority, the ndp is the best bet in most ridings. in some ridings, however, there may be a progressive liberal candidate but not in most of them.
a jack layton government would pretty much operate the same way as an ndp government in manitoba — a strict adherence to balanced budgets, no corporate tax breaks, no stupid fighter jet purchases, no endless wars, perhaps increased taxes on the most wealthy, and using the savings to expand social programs.
please don’t buy the Bay Street/Liberal/Con rhetoric about tax and spend ndpers. it’s pure baloney.
the NDP actually has university economists with PhDs running as candidates — unlike the morons in the Conservatives who cut taxes and created a government deficit BEFORE the recession hit.
Apr 26, 2011 @ 07:33:56
“My next thought is ‘holy crap, how are you going to pay for all of that?’”
It’s spelled out in the platform.
Looking at the results in your riding might help you decided who to vote for.
Apr 26, 2011 @ 07:57:09
@roger: A few good points, I had forgotten to mention that the Liberals are generally not in the anti-war camp. I disagree that any vote is wasted, though. Even knowing full-well that my local Green candidate will not win, the fact that they got 10% of the vote last time has likely affected the other parties, pushing them to pick up some parts of the Green agenda to not lose more votes.
@Darwin: Please, show me where the costing is spelled out. There’s absolutely nothing (that I can see) in the platform PDF about how any of this will be paid for, and searching on google for budget/costing only gives links to people analyzing the platform and saying it’s impossible. I really want to see their own costing, if it exists. I have heard there is some spreadsheet (that people have since made fun of) showing some costs, but I can’t find it.
Apr 26, 2011 @ 08:57:40
I assumed it was. It appears to be in a separate document. During his policy announcements he always gave a source of revenue for his polices.
Apr 26, 2011 @ 12:25:20
I think the responses to the post shows part of the problem with our politics. Stop slagging the other guy and strong arming voters and just explain your alternate vision with all the relevant facts and costing to convince someone.
People don’t need to be told how to vote, they just given complete accurate information and time to digest it.